Secure Is a Nuclear Waste Truck?
New York Times, June 19, 2002
By Jim Hall
With the arrest of Jose Padilla, our worst fears were confirmed: Al
Qaeda was planning to build and detonate a dirty bomb containing nuclear
material in an American city. A danger previously relegated to Hollywood
screenplays is now a reality.
At the same time, the Senate is in the process of making the most important
transportation decision of the new century whether or not to
move 77,000 tons of high-level nuclear waste from power plants nationwide
to Yucca Mountain in Nevada. For more than 20 years, debate on the Yucca
Mountain project has centered on only half of the issue. The Department
of Energy has spent more than $7 billion and 24 years studying the geology
of potential repository sites, but only four percent of that has been
spent on transportation issues. Yet even despite that spending, Secretary
of Energy Spencer Abraham said recently that the department is "just
beginning to formulate its preliminary thoughts about a transportation
plan." Now, in light of Sept. 11, proceeding with the Yucca Mountain
project without a fully secure transportation plan that takes into account
terrorism threats is dangerous and irresponsible.
Government officials believe Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations
have sought to purchase uranium and the other necessary tools to make
a dirty bomb. According to experts, each truck container of spent nuclear
fuel (containers used for rail and barge transport would be bigger)
headed for Yucca Mountain would carry more radioactive material than
was released by the nuclear bombs used in World War II. If one of these
containers were breached, in an accident or a terrorist attack, the
results would be catastrophic.
Before Congress makes any decision on where to store this country's
nuclear waste, it must first determine whether that waste can be safely
transported on our highways, waterways and railways. Congress must require
that the Department of Energy conduct a comprehensive risk assessment
considering all potential hazards, including terrorist threats. Congress
must also demand that the department develop a transportation safety
plan that outlines steps to be taken in the event of terrorist acts
and accidents. And there must be full-scale testing of the containers
to be used for transporting this waste. The transportation plan must
be created in an open process that includes input from state and local
officials and the public. With our enemy in active pursuit of dirty
bombs, our considerations about nuclear waste management have to change.
Secretary Abraham has said there is plenty of time to create a transportation
plan before Yucca Mountain begins receiving nuclear waste eight years
from now. But safety issues will almost certainly get short shrift if
they are not addressed before the repository site is approved. Congress
needs to force the Department of Energy to reassess the dangers of transporting
high-level nuclear waste and develop a secure plan before proceeding
with the Yucca Mountain project.
Jim Hall, a member of the National Academy of Engineering's Committee
on Combating Terrorism, was chairman of the National Transportation
Safety Board from 1994 to 2001.