|
Newsletter N° 20 (Cadarache
Special)
Use and management of MOX fuel in Germany (as
of 31 December 1999)
|
Reactor 3
|
Site
Name
|
Weight of FE
|
In reactor
core
|
In Storage
Facilities
|
Already
Stored 2
|
% max.
of MOX
|
|
COGEMA
|
BNFL
|
CLAB
|
Other 1
|
Total
|
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
tHM
|
%
|
| KBR |
Brokdorf |
0,530
|
33,9
|
11,1
|
10,1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
55,1
|
33
|
| KKU |
Unterweser |
0,530
|
25,4
|
15,4
|
2,1
|
14,3
|
0
|
0
|
57,2
|
33
|
| KWG |
Grohnde |
0,530
|
8,5
|
2,7
|
14,3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
25,5
|
33
|
| KWO |
Obrigheim |
0,286
|
4,6
|
6,9
|
1,1
|
0
|
9,4
|
0,3
|
22,3
|
23
|
| KKP2 |
Philippsburg 2 |
0,532
|
27,1
|
25,0
|
5,3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
57,4
|
37
|
| GKN1 |
Neckarwestheim 1 |
0,357
|
0
|
0
|
5,7
|
0
|
0
|
5,7
|
11,4
|
9
|
| GKN2 |
Neckarwestheim 2 |
0,535
|
8,6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8,6
|
37
|
| KRBB |
Gundremmingen B |
0,174
|
21,6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
21,6
|
38
|
| KRBC |
Gundremmingen C |
0,174
|
2,1
|
0,7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2,8
|
38
|
| KKI2 |
Isar 2 |
0,535
|
8,6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8,6
|
50
|
| KKG |
Grafenrheinfeld |
0,533
|
2,1
|
12,8
|
17,1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
32,0
|
33
|
Shut down installations
|
|
| KRBA |
Grundemmingen A |
0,117
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7,5
|
0
|
7,5
|
| KNK2 |
Karlsruhe |
0,021
|
0
|
0
|
0,3
|
0
|
0
|
0,1
|
0,4
|
| MZFR |
Karlsruhe |
0,055
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0,4
|
0
|
0,4
|
| VAK |
Kahl |
0,058
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0,1
|
6,5
|
0
|
6,6
|
| Total |
|
|
142,5
|
74,6
|
56
|
14,4
|
23,8
|
6,1
|
317,4
|
1 at KWO: WAK; at GKN1: Block 2 cooling pond; at KNK2: FZK
Karlsruhe/hot cells
2 Gorleben's Storage Facility / Ahaus Center: 0 tML
3 Authorized reactors for MOX loading but not loaded: KKE-Emsland
(25%),
KWBA-Biblis A (41%), KWBB-Biblis B (41%), KKB-Brunbüttel (26%),
KKK-Krümmel (25%), KKI1-Isar1 (54%)
tHM : tons of heavy metal
FE : Fuel Elements
Source: GRS, 'Entsorgung abgebrannter Brennelemente aus den Kernkraftwerken
in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland',
June 2000
Translation and presentation by WISE-Paris
MOX Plants in the World: capacities
and output at end of 2000
|
Site
|
Country
|
Operator
|
Capacity
in tHM
|
Type of
fuel
|
Commissioning
|
Output
in 2000
in tHM
|
Total at
end 2000
in tHM
|
Clients
|
|
CFCa
(Cadarache)
|
France
|
CEA - COGEMA
|
1.5
|
FBR
|
1961
|
0.0
|
~ 105.0
|
FR, DE
|
|
and 35
|
PWR/BWR
|
1989
|
41.4
|
244.9
|
|
|
France
|
COGEMA
|
101.3
|
PWR
|
1996
|
101.0
|
434.6
|
FR, JP
|
|
and 44.2
|
BWR
|
1999
|
|
MDF
(Sellafield)
|
United Kingdom
|
BNFL
|
8
|
PWR/BWR
|
1993
|
0.0
|
|
DE, CH, JP
|
|
P0
(Dessel)
|
Belgium
|
Belgonucleaire
|
10
|
FBR
|
1973
|
0.0
|
|
FR, B, DE, CH, JP
|
|
or 35
|
PWR/BWR
|
1986
|
37.0
|
451.9
|
|
|
Japan
|
JNC
|
40
|
ATR
|
1988
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
JP
|
|
or 5
|
FBR
|
0.0
|
~ 16
|
|
|
Japan
|
JNC
|
10
|
ATR
|
1971
|
~ 6.0
|
~ 150
|
|
or 1
|
FBR
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
|
AFFF
(Tarapur)
|
India
|
BARC
|
20
|
PHWR
BWR ?
|
1990 ?
|
?
|
?
|
India
|
PFPF : Plutonium Fuel Production Facility
PFFF : Plutonium Fuel Fabrication Facility
AFFF : Advanced Fuel Fabrication Facility
BARC : Bhabha Atomic Research Center
Notes:
1 The technical capacity of MELOX is more
like 145.5 tHM but its output is limited by decree (n°99-664 du
30/07/1999), to 101.3 tHM
2 BNFL, written response to Sellafield Local Liaison Committee,
dated 2 December 1999. from CORE (Cumbrians Opposed to a Radioactive
Environment)
3 According to CNIC (Citizens Nuclear Information
Center), Tokyo
Back
|