The election of a new Israeli government on the
threshold of the new millennium raises hopes of significant
steps towards a more tolerant, human, democratic and transparent
society in the Middle East. Our expectations are focused on
social, economic and humanitarian issues in all countries, but
our particular concern here is focused on Israel, where one
of our colleagues is imprisoned.
We, 58 Laureates of the Right Livelihood Award (Alternative
Nobel Prize) from over 30 countries have been meeting in Salzburg,
Austria, to mark the 20th anniversary of the Award. We are teachers,
scientists, rural workers and activists for peace and social
justice in all continents and we hereby unanimously call on
the government of Israel to:
- release immediately the political prisoner
Mordechai Vanunu, who is our fellow RLA Laureate;
- approve the organisation of a regional
conference under the auspices of the United Nations to consider
the feasibility and potential benefits of a project to make
the Middle East a region free of weapons of mass destruction.
Successive
Israeli governments - like many others - have equated weapons
with security and therefore believe that more weapons mean more
security. But what if they are wrong? What if the possession
of more nuclear weapons equals less security and actually poses
an increasing threat to the country by provoking others to enter
the arms race?
The
Knesset has never debated the government's decision to acquire
nuclear weapons. Nor has it considered the advantages for national
security that could accrue from a treaty banning nuclear and
other weapons of mass destruction from the region. We note that
the past and current weapons programme also has serious environmental
and health implications for the Israeli people. Current reports
of a risk to the Dimona plant posed by the Y2K computer bug
are only one example. The issue of radioactive waste management
- which raises particular difficulties in a country with such
a small land surface and which will have consequences for thousands
of years to come - also needs to be addressed in open debate.
We,
the assembled Laureates of the Right Livelihood Award call on
the government, on the leaders of all political parties and
on individual members of the Knesset to initiate a full-scale
parliamentary debate on the political, strategic, environmental
and health implications of Israel's nuclear weapons programme.
The best interests of the people of Israel for a secure and
sustainable future would, we believe, be reflected in an agreement
to rid the Middle East of weapons of mass destruction, many
of which the country cannot control as long as they exist.
Mordechai
Vanunu considered that as a nuclear technician at Dimona he
was in a particular position and morally obliged to do something
which he felt would ultimately increase security and the basis
for peace in the region. By releasing information on the extent
of the Israeli nuclear weapons programme - doubtless an illegal
act in itself - he made it possible for the issue to be debated
by the international community on the basis of facts rather
than suspicions.
Vanunu is far from alone in his analysis
and convictions. A broad range of politicians, analysts and
citizens have by now come to the same conclusion - that long-term
stability in the Middle East will only be reached if the region
is cleansed of weapons of mass destruction. We are only adding
our voices from 40 countries to the thousands which have already
called for his release.
Vanunu has paid a very high price for
his convictions. Twelve years after the Right Livelihood Award
gave him their international prize "for his courage and self-sacrifice
in revealing the extent of Israel's nuclear weapons programme,
he has spent 12_ years in prison and more than 11 of those years
in solitary confinement under conditions condemned by Amnesty
International as "cruel, inhuman and degrading". After such
a long time, the technical secrets that Vanunu possessed are
entirely outdated.
It
is time to end the pain of this man. His release would be not
only a humanitarian encouragement but also a signal of the government's
intentions for peace and reconciliation in the Middle East.
(Signed)
Full list of names attached
Salzburg, 1 June 1999
Signatories: Annelies Allain (Netherlands/Malaysia)
Sunderlal Bahuguna (India)
Rosalie Bertell (Canada)
Andras Biro (Hungary)
Carmel Budiardjo (UK/Indonesia)
Zafrullah Chowdhury (Bangladesh)
Mike Cooley (United Kingdom)
Stephen Corry (UK/International)
Marie-Therese Danielsson (Sweden/Tahiti)
Hans-Peter Durr (Germany)
Samuel Epstein (United States)
Johan Galtung (Norway/France)
Stephen Gaskin (United States)
Edward Goldsmith (United Kingdom)
Mohammed Idris (Malaysia)
Wilfred Karunaratne (Sri Lanka)
Martin Khor Kok Peng (Malaysia)
Joseph Ki-Zerbo (Burkina Faso)
Katarina Kruhonja (Croatia)
Ida Kuklina (Russia)
T P Kunhikannan (India)
Liubov Kuznetsova (Russia)
Felicia Langer (Germany/Israel)
Amory Lovins (United States)
Jose Lutzenberger (Brazil)
Wangari Maathai (Kenya)
Helen Mack Chang (Guatemala)
Alice Tepper Marlin (United States)
Tapio Mattlar (Finland)
Manfred Max-Neef (Chile)
Ledum Mitee (Nigeria)
Ruth Montrichard (Trinidad & Tobago)
Frances Moore-Lappe (United States)
Phunchok Namgial (Ladakh/India)
Helena Norberg-Hodge (United Kingdom)
Evaristo Nugkuag (Peru)
Sithembiso Nyoni (Zimbabwe)
Juan Pablo Orrego (Chile)
Nancy-Jo Peck (United States)
Vijay Pratap (India)
Peter Rosset (United States)
Mycle Schneider (Germany/France)
Vandana Shiva (India)
Sulak Sivaraksa (Thailand)
Paulo Sousa Decio (Brazil)
Joao Pedro Stedile (Brazil)
Michael Succow (Germany)
Hanumappa Sudarshan (India)
Vesna Terselic (Croatia)
Yuji Tsuchijama (Japan)
John F C Turner (United Kingdom)
Theo van Boven (Netherlands)
Patrick van Rensburg (Botswana)
Janos Vargha (Hungary)
George Vithoulkas (Greece)
Legesse Wolde-Yohannes (Ethiopia)
Melaku Worede (Ethiopia)
Alla Yaroshinskaya (Russia)