The production of MOX
With the addition of a production line of about 50
tons/year at MELOX, intended to produce MOX for boiling water reactorsnecessarily
for foreign, primary Japanese clients, since EDF uses only pressurized
water reactorsthe plant theoretically now possesses a total annual
capacity of 165 tons of oxides (COGEMA even indicates a technical capacity
of 250 tons/year), but remains limited to an authorized annual
production of 115 tons of oxides (around 100 tons of heavy metal), which
was reached in 1998. This limitation of annual production has allowed
the new Marcoule line, the construction of which was complete even before
publication of its permit on 30 July 1999, to avoid having to get around
problems and opposition that a new public inquiry (certainly necessary
in the case of a production rate increase) could have aroused. It is
to be noted that this "true-false" capacity increase was approved
by the Minister of the Environment, Dominique Voynet, in July 1999,
even though two years earlier she had declared (1):
"I would sign no decree for the extension of the plant
in order to produce and export more", which, moreover, corresponded
to one of the main points of the common Greens-Socialist political text
of March 1997. If it is true that the plant does not produce more, it
does indeed manufacture fuel for export.
While EDF is obliged to alternate between MOX and
UOXand to pile up tons of supplementary plutoniumfor lack
of plutonium fuel, COGEMA chooses to turn to foreign customers. In this
context, how can the famous "equality of flow" targeted by
the MOX program be realized? In fact, each ton produced at MELOX for
Japan or at Cadarache for Germany (whose closing DSIN had demanded,
moreover, "soon after 2000") is a ton less produced for EDFand
everyone is satisfied. For EDF is not at all favorable to MOX on principle.
Each ton of MOX avoided is a net financial saving for the company obliged
to seek savings where it can. Furthermore, Germany and Japan have little,
or even no more, capacity for disposal of plutonium or for MOX production.
(1) Dominique Voynet, Politis, 18 September
1997.
Previous
page
To
be continued (Scraps from the manufacture of MOX)
Back
to contents